Jump to content

Fuelling (95 vs 98ron) - 00' 986 2.7


Adamw

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply
13 minutes ago, Jason986S said:

Beru from ECP will do just fine (you'll get 20%+ discount using their regular codes too)

Thanks 

My view is to just replace the offending coil rather than all 6 as this will work out quite costly and the reader did only mention cylinder 5...?

If the engine light was cleared, should that last error code still exist if an OBD is plugged in even if the engine light hasn't yet been re-triggered ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Adamw said:

If the engine light was cleared, should that last error code still exist if an OBD is plugged in even if the engine light hasn't yet been re-triggered ? 

Any ideas on this one ? 

Cheers 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the error was cleared with a device then it's gone. If a light has triggered and then gone out by itself it should be in the history.  Depends sometimes on what you are using to check with. The generic readers are just that. If you feel it's not running weĺl get someone to check it on a Porsche specific reader, there are a list of durametric owners in a thread/sticky on the forum.Forum durametric owners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, T24RES said:

If the error was cleared with a device then it's gone. If a light has triggered and then gone out by itself it should be in the history.  Depends sometimes on what you are using to check with. The generic readers are just that. If you feel it's not running weĺl get someone to check it on a Porsche specific reader, there are a list of durametric owners in a thread/sticky on the forum.Forum durametric owners.

Thanks mate 

No owners near Sussex .. :(

Booked in at precision Porsche Sussex for a scan Mon 

Hopefully just a coil as suspected ! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been running 98ron this weekend instead of the 95 I've been using. I confess, I never checked the fuel flap and now I have, I won't be short-changing my fuel system again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, sential said:

Have an 03 Boxster sport, I fuel up at Sainsburys and note that their more pricey unleaded is 97ron. Good enough I hope? Or better to find somewhere selling 98ron?

I think that's near enough not to be worth bothering about the extra RON if the petrol station is convenient. I suspect most people run Boxsters on 95 Ron all the time with no issue, an extra couple of BHP is not going to be noticeable to a driver unless they already believe the fuel is better. Very much down to the placeabo effect IMHO on NA cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/10/2016 at 5:38 PM, Adamw said:

Thanks mate 

No owners near Sussex .. :(

Booked in at precision Porsche Sussex for a scan Mon 

Hopefully just a coil as suspected ! 

 

Well, been to have this checked out today and it's not the coils I suspected.  All the coils were in tact.

Suspected MAF issue causing misfires.

I mentioned possibly cleaning the MAF but was told they've tried this on a number of occasions with no real success.

They quoted £234 for a new MAF sensor then half hours labour to fit so inc VAT nearly £300...

I've found Bosch MAF's on eBay for much less (from £117) and intend to try fitting myself to save on labour (If I can get to the engine - see thread in "technical section")

These look right don't they? 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/300987442733 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/272371904396 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/381350926413 

Precison did mention that the MAF would be the 1st port of call then maybe if no joy O2 sensors would be next which could be another £300+ fitted ..:(

Least if I do the MAF myself it will soften the expense if O2's need doing ...

Is it worth me changing the air filter whilst I'm in there? 

Guess this will do the job:

https://www.design911.co.uk/mobile/#part;id=3781

Cheers

Adam 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Nobbie said:

.... Very much down to the placeabo effect IMHO on NA cars.

These were exactly my thoughts... I think you will feel it on some turbo cars. Years ago I had a Volvo T5 which was very sensitive to fuel choices. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Adamw this is where I start wondering what the point of paying 'specialist' labour rates is when they can't identify the fault and will just change stuff at your expense until something works - I can do that myself thanks ? Surely if it's the O2 sensors then there would be a code showing? Also, if it's the MAF then isn't the standard diagnostic test to take off the connector and force the engine into it's default fuel map. If the car runs fine, then it's time for a new MAF, if not then the problem lies elsewhere.

If it does turn out to be the MAF, I think I'd have a go at cleaning it myself first, you can buy aerosol cans of specific cleaner for MAFs. Maybe an Air Oil Separator has let go in the past and mucked up the MAF.

I wouldn't bother changing the air filter as long as the car is serviced to schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nobbie said:

@Adamw this is where I start wondering what the point of paying 'specialist' labour rates is when they can't identify the fault and will just change stuff at your expense until something works - I can do that myself thanks ? Surely if it's the O2 sensors then there would be a code showing? Also, if it's the MAF then isn't the standard diagnostic test to take off the connector and force the engine into it's default fuel map. If the car runs fine, then it's time for a new MAF, if not then the problem lies elsewhere.

If it does turn out to be the MAF, I think I'd have a go at cleaning it myself first, you can buy aerosol cans of specific cleaner for MAFs. Maybe an Air Oil Separator has let go in the past and mucked up the MAF.

I wouldn't bother changing the air filter as long as the car is serviced to schedule.

@Nobbie...

Thanks for that. Didn't know you could simply disconnect the MAF sensor and the car would run a default mode.

If this is the case, then I'll try this 1st :thumbsup_anim:

Not sure when the air filter was last changed as no mention in service history so may well just bung one in whilst I'm in there for cost of twenty quid or so.. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Menoporsche said:

Is it the MAF or another sensor where Porsche seemed to fit several different ones, and you have to make sure you replace exactly the same one?

Yes, it's the Maf. It has a unique part code. The 2.5 differs from the 3.2 etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Menoporsche said:

Not only the engine size but I think they changed every couple of years (possibly linked with the incremental power increases).  Just do your homework before buying.

Ok thanks 

Ive found a 986.606.125.00 and a 986.606.125.01 so I guess the 1st thing to do is get in there, locate/remove existing to check number to see what's in there.

Next run it unplugged to check if misfire/poor-running disappears. 

If so clean MAF, reconnect and test. 

Then order another once part number known if the MAF looks like the culprit 

:thumbsup_anim:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Id run it unplugged before I removed it. If it's not the culprit, this will save you some time. If it is, you can take it out know it's worth the skinned knuckles.. 

Ps. Don't be too shocked of your security torx that hold it in round off under pressure. Dremmel will help cut a new surface. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks mate !! 

Quick question : 

Is the car likely to throw engine lights with the MAF sensor unplugged? If so, is there anyway to switch this lights off again without a fault reader? 

Cheers 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Loz987 said:

Id run it unplugged before I removed it. If it's not the culprit, this will save you some time. If it is, you can take it out know it's worth the skinned knuckles.. 

Ps. Don't be too shocked of your security torx that hold it in round off under pressure. Dremmel will help cut a new surface. 

Ok, just been trying to "pull the plug" but achieving nothing but sore fingers..

Is there a nack ... it seems welded on!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is  ?

As you look at the plug,  there looks to be a little square of plastic that looks like you should press down, don't. What you need to do is push the whole connector on to the sensor as far as it will go,  then just with your nail pull the square tab away from the sensor,  same direction as the wiring harness,  then whilst keeping pressure on the tab slide the whole thing back. 

There is a nack to it but one you figure it you can upset all the mechanics & vag people who end up breaking the tab off lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, motosparkz said:

There is  ?

As you look at the plug,  there looks to be a little square of plastic that looks like you should press down, don't. What you need to do is push the whole connector on to the sensor as far as it will go,  then just with your nail pull the square tab away from the sensor,  same direction as the wiring harness,  then whilst keeping pressure on the tab slide the whole thing back. 

There is a nack to it but one you figure it you can upset all the mechanics & vag people who end up breaking the tab off lol 

D98ACF47-8480-4E43-AD0A-8D74F8C737B2_zps

 

Here is a pic I took of the face nearest the wing and I assume this shows the little square of plastic you refer to? 

So;

1/push connecter fully down as far as I can.

2/try to pull little square lug back up (towards wiring) 

3/whilst continuing to apply pressure on lug try to pull the connector upwards.

Great thanks, I'll try this tonight

 :thumbsup_anim:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...