Nellyans Posted December 29, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 29, 2017 LN will not sell just the bearing on its own...I asked only in kit form Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edc Posted December 29, 2017 Report Share Posted December 29, 2017 Unless you are a competent DIY-er then the comparison costs aren't really worth looking at. Unless you are in the trade or have a very strong relationship with a Porsche indy or a confident and competent mechanic then nobody will fit a bag of components for you. It's hard enough to have a garage fit your own self sourced parts already unless you have some kind of relationship established with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikefocke Posted December 29, 2017 Report Share Posted December 29, 2017 The LN kits come with matching bearing, other improved parts, a well tested and documented set of instructions and a kit of tools necessary to do the job. By "comes with" I don't mean the tools are included in the price but rather as something you can buy that is known to work. Seen too many sad stories of people who try to follow other directions of the "it is on the web, it must be true" variety and find that something subtle was left out or explained poorly or just misinterpreted. The LN directions have been through multiple revisions based on feedback. Not saying you can't do a successful IMS swap without all that support. But you are doing the swap to reduce risk .... Whatever you do, do the pre-installation qualification procedure LN suggests. Look at the filter and pan and only then drop the trans and order your bearing or bearing kit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_ly Posted December 29, 2017 Report Share Posted December 29, 2017 I wouldn't worry about the IMS bearing, my 3.2 is on 137k miles, single row bearing so it shows with regular oil changes higher mileages are possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nellyans Posted December 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2017 19 hours ago, edc said: Unless you are a competent DIY-er then the comparison costs aren't really worth looking at. Unless you are in the trade or have a very strong relationship with a Porsche indy or a confident and competent mechanic then nobody will fit a bag of components for you. It's hard enough to have a garage fit your own self sourced parts already unless you have some kind of relationship established with them. If I had a ramp I would have done myself as it’s just spanner Work locking cams off etc I work in R&D my role is engine build and I also strip and document engine conditions from cold climate and altitude testing.Like I have mentioned I’m lucky my brother in law has his own VAG automotive garage.All done now pleased with outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nellyans Posted December 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2017 9 hours ago, james_ly said: I wouldn't worry about the IMS bearing, my 3.2 is on 137k miles, single row bearing so it shows with regular oil changes higher mileages are possible. I totally agree with you mine also was a single row.I changed my oil every 1000 mile expensive I know but mine never let go and when I removed as I said at 80k was fully intact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
niceone Posted December 30, 2017 Report Share Posted December 30, 2017 Would a 987 2006 be a strong ims bearing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikefocke Posted December 30, 2017 Report Share Posted December 30, 2017 A 2006 would have the best (third generation, large single row) IMS bearing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headless Posted December 30, 2017 Report Share Posted December 30, 2017 Mine's a 2006, I bought it for that reason, but apparently it was the changeover year, so you may or may not have the better bearing, I'm gonna take the gamble cos it's supposed to be about between 1% and 6% failure rate, it's one of those things that's been blown out of proportion, I'll take those odds!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
niceone Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 OMG im in a ponder now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southy Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 26 minutes ago, niceone said: OMG im in a ponder now I've been on this forum for three years now, I've known of two engines let go, one was an IMS - @mrbikerdood 986 2.7 and Jason986s which wasn't the IMS Considering all the cars we have on here with different mileages, I thinks that speaks for itself. Buy the car you like, put the key in it start and and enjoy it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edc Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 Here's what an IMS bearing from a 10 year old 115k mile car looks like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spyderman8 Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 I’ve been involved in Boxster racing now since 2011 and in that time I’ve only actually seen one IMS fail, but there have been others. We generally race MkI and II 986s and obviously they lead a pretty tough life once converted from road cars. Left in storage for weeks, sometime months, then dragged out to receive a sound thrashing. It’s amazing we don’t get more fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EXY Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 2 hours ago, spyderman8 said: I’ve been involved in Boxster racing now since 2011 and in that time I’ve only actually seen one IMS fail, but there have been others. We generally race MkI and II 986s and obviously they lead a pretty tough life once converted from road cars. Left in storage for weeks, sometime months, then dragged out to receive a sound thrashing. It’s amazing we don’t get more fail. Wasn't it this very fact that lent credence to the 'higher revs' being better for the engine theory? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spyderman8 Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 35 minutes ago, EXY said: Wasn't it this very fact that lent credence to the 'higher revs' being better for the engine theory? That's certainly one school of thought. I don't know of anyone - either BRSCC or PCGB - who has bothered with an expensive third party bearing replacement, but some do have partnerships with Hartech and have spent considerable sums on their engines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maz23 Posted January 6, 2018 Report Share Posted January 6, 2018 On 02/10/2017 at 6:02 PM, K.I.T.T. said: What's this race bearing? Never heard of it. Allegedly, stock (OE, OEM or aftermarket) replacement dual row IMS bearings are NLA which can make things tricky. My dual row IMSB was in good fettle after 116k and was left alone. They look at the condition by removing a seal and looking at the ball bearings. The seal was simply replaced. If a clutch change is imminent and you have a single row IMSB, it may be worth investing in an aftermarket upgrade if you want reassurance. Having said that, your engine may fail from something else. Look at what happened to Jason's 3.2. I'm of the train of thought that the IMSB issue is somewhat blown out of proportion. Then again, I wouldn't purchase a car that I knew was guaranteed to have a single row bearing. I'd look at early cars or a 987.2 / 997.2. That's me though... One company's Theory is the intermediate shaft when it gets hot expands and pushes the air within Outwood through the bearing & seal .then when cold it creates a vacuum pulling a very small amount of oil back into the tube through the bearing & Seal ,because this oil can't get back out and can't be filtered or replaced with fresh oil as such , after a period of time it turns rancid then turns to acid. Apparently more on cars that are sitting for awhile and don't get used as often.. So when the tube expands it pushes small amounts of this oil back through the bearing and seal multiple times till the oil has washed the Grease out the bearing and this is when they fail just because the bearings sits partially submerged in oil doesn't mean it's getting lubricated as when spinning at speed the oil is forced away from the bearings, but it doesn't happen on all cars ? This is where they're saying the oil feed bearing kit works as the outer seal is removed and oil is injected into the bearing ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.